Thursday, September 10, 2009

The Task Force has Failed with their Assignment.

Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Copake 230 Mountain View Road Copake NY 12529 September 1, 2009 Attention: Supervisor Crowley and Members of the Town Board; We, The Zoning Board of Appeals, upon the request of the Town Board, have reviewed the proposed changes to Chapter 156; Junkyards and Motor Vehicle Storage Areas. In our opinion, the Task Force has failed with their assignment. Our Town is changing, the times are changing. We want these business' to remain in Copake, but there is a need for them to" clean up their act", and take some pride in their business'. This street of mixed use, residential and business is the southern entrance of the town. First impressions are made here, how do we want to portray our town? Clearly the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles has issued these business' a license. It clarifies whether they are a repair, dismantler, dealer, or a combination, with clear and precise rules as to what they are and are not allowed to do. However, the question remains, What exactly are they licensed to do, and are they in compliance with the licenses that have been issued? Furthermore, the proposed changes are far too vague, they need to be more specific. The issue has been "white-washed or swept under the carpet" and will be impossible to enforce since there is no structure, with far too many loop holes. Safety, environmental issues, noise, pollution, and fire codes have not been addressed. Many residents within the town have expressed concerns of the ground water issues, imagine what 60 cars to the first acre, not to exceed 200 for the additional acreage will do to the ground water, keeping in mind the stream and wetlands that surround some of these areas. Why would we allow vehicles for repair to be placed with vehicles for sale? Is it not an eye sore as well as a safety issue to allow a car with no tires and on blocks or one with no fenders to remain in the front. Will a four foot space between rows of stored vehicles be ample to allow a fire truck or emergency vehicles access in case of a fire, spill, or accident? Why would we change the fencing requirement setbacks from 300 feet to 50 feet? Who will reap the benefit here, the residential neighboring property? Imagine their air quality, will trees screen the fumes as well? We do not endorse the proposed changes to Chapter 156, of the Town Law, and we recommend that the Task Force be returned to complete the task to which they were assigned. In addition, it is recommended that prior to writing out any proposed future changes that they meet with the Planning Board and The Zoning Board of Appeals and at least hear their recommendations, as well as input from the Zoning Enforcement Officer, The Building Inspector, The Fire Chief, DEC, and any other pertinent party. Most Sincerely, The Board Members of The Zoning Board of Appeals

3 comments:

  1. you should be happy that people like this pays taxes to the town and keeps the bussiness here in col. co. people need to make a living to . to change the law every month is not the way to keep people in copake.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I pay taxes and I also recall when Copake looked beautiful and was prosperous. Times have certainly changed. We have had zoning since May of 1972 and this new proposed law is a step backwards as far as I am concerned. The appearance of the properties is one thing, but the environmental impact is quite another. The groundwater issue is critical and considering Mr. Weber's advocacy on the Environmental Committee I am surprised he would support anything that would be construed to have a negative impact on the groundwater. This needs to be voted down and the board best take heed on this. Going backwards on this is Not Progress.
    BTW-what backround do any of these task force members have in this field? Wouldn't it have been smarter to task the zoning folks with this??
    I guess that's what I would have done if I was the supevisor!

    ReplyDelete