Monday, October 12, 2009

Improving the Quality of the Police

Lately there has been a lot of discussion about the Copake Police force. Some think cutting the hours is a good place to save money. Others feel cutting it would be an invitation for more crime.

There is a third option and that is to mere the Copake police into the County Sheriffs organization. It is something that is not new and is similar to what is under consideration in Hamilton County, Ohio. Hamilton County includes the city of Cincinnati, and many other small municipalities. Norwood, Ohio is an example. It measures just one mile by two mile or about 1200 acres.

While Copake is much bigger in size than Norwood, it has many less people making efficiency policing harder to achieve. Merging the smaller police forces has been tried around Louisville, Kentucky too. The experience in Louisville has been that it did not save any money, but did improve the efficiency and quality of policing. Merging the Copake Police into the County Sheriffs office should offer similar results. There is little question a larger police force can offer better training, more flexibility in scheduling with better utilization of equipment. By merging the Copake Police the town would not save money but would improve the quality of policing.
Grant

JunkYard Wars

JunkYard Wars

Several months ago, Town Board leadership decided to appoint a task force to review the only zoning law in Copake that is still under the Town Board’s direct control. To be clear, Motor Vehicle Storage Permit regulation of junk yards and motor vehicle operations are, in every other town I know, regulated by zoning, not by town boards – and there are very good reasons for that.

Copake’s citizens may well decide they like the message it sends to visitors when junkers are strewn along entry roads to our town. There is, however, no argument about the environmental consequences of leaving rusting, useless hulks along the road and in fields for years. That is why in virtually every other town across America, requires permits and regulations to store rusting vehicles whose broken or dismantled parts leak anti -freeze, brake fluid, power steering fluid, motor, transmission and rear end oil into town grounds and water systems where those toxic fluids and rust leach into the earth and water, are almost impossible to get. This is not a Republican v Democrat issue. This is not a political football to use in election politics. This is an important land use issue about poisoning land and people. In every other town I know, it’s decided by professionals, not amateurs running for local office.

Sadly, that is what has happened in Copake. The first step in politicizing this important law, was Republican majority leadership on the board, naming the two fellow nominees for Copake Town Board, Harvey Weber and Joe Laporta as the majority members of the “Task Force.”

It’s been reported to me that Mr. Weber and Laporta said they don’t need to listen to the local ZBA or Planning Board – both of whom wrote strong letters to the Town Board leadership condemning the “Task Force”.

The ZBA stressed, among other things, that environmental issues are not being addressed with this law. The planning Board stressed that junkyards are not allowed in Copake period. They recommended that the entire chapter 156, addressing this issue needs to be re-written by a professional, land-use attorney – as opposed to two candidates running for public office.

There may be a short term victory here for our junkyard operations masquerading as repair shops but it’s hardly a legacy to be proud of. I note that Mr.Weber, as recently as October 7, spoke proudly of his commitment to the environment but I find that hard to square that with his commitment to junkyards in Copake. There’s still time for Mr. Weber to reject his defense of polluters. It may be good politics for their votes and fundraising but toxic policy for our citizens.

I do hope our two candidates on the “Task Force” will air their thoughts about their conduct by speaking to us in public forums and in print between now and November two. The election will be over in a few weeks, but Copake’s citizens and its children will live with the results of this reckless decision in their food and water for years to come.

Ian

With Great Appreciation

Dear Bob:

The chronicle keeps getting better and better. You have performed such a great service for Copake. I have begun sharing it with friends and family around the country and they love it too. My son lives in Virginia and he feels reconnected to home by reading your web site each week. I just wanted to say thank you. I can’t imagine how many hours it takes you to make it so enjoyable, but we all love it.

With great appreciation.

Amanda

Grants for the Court Room

To the Editor, I recently received a campaign flyer for Judge Brian Herman running for reelection in the Town of Copake. After reading his flyer I am a bit confused about what he is claiming he did for the Town of Copake. Specifically obtaining a grant for a new rug in the main room of the Copake Town Hall. Yes we have a new rug & a grant was obtained for it, but Judge Herman at the January reorganization meeting told the town board & the public that his court clerk was solely responsibly for the grant for the carpeting. Now he is saying he obtained the grant. Is he being a little dishonest here or is he just playing with words in his flyer. In either case, I believe he is not being totally honest with the taxpayers & residents of Copake. Therefore how do we know he will not carry this dishonesty to the courtroom? Maybe it’s time for the voters of Copake to elect a new judge.

Jeff Nayer

Copake